Questioning & Answers
God's Godliness

Death & Survival


QUESTION:...MIGHT not EXISTENCE, AND THE SURVIVAL of EXISTENCE BE not HING MORE THAN A "BY PRODUCT" of TRIAL AND ERROR WITHIN A VAST ARRAY of POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE FORCES WITHIN EVOLVING ENDEAVORS THAT Are BUT NATURALLY OCCURRING?
IF not , WHY?
REPLY...NO!
If such were the case:
***Then the results of existence would have Not allowed existence to have taken place.
***Then the survival of existence would have Not taken place.
***Then the results of trial and error within the vast array of positive and negative forces, **would Not** have afforded an intelligent enough direction for survival to become pre-empted within existence itself.
***Then the results of trial and error within the vast array of positive and negative forces, **would Not** have afforded survival to become pre-empted has existence itself.

QUESTION:...MIGHT not Sin , AND THE SURVIVAL of EXISTENCE BE not HING MORE THAN A "BALANCE" of THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE FORCES WITHIN EVOLVING ENDEAVORS THAT Are BUT NATURALLY OCCURRING?
IF not , WHY?
REPLY...NO!
If such were the case:
***Then the balance of existence would depend upon sin to allow existence to take place.
***Then the balance of existence would depend upon sin to allow survival to take place..
***Then the results of trial and error within the vast array of positive and negative forces, **would Not** have afforded an intelligent enough direction for survival to become pre-empted within existence itself.
***Then the results of trial and error within the vast array of positive and negative forces, **would Not** have afforded survival to become pre-empted has existence itself.
***Then the results of trial and error within the vast array of positive and negative forces, **would Not** have afforded survival to pre-empted the advent of death itself.

QUESTION:...MIGHT not Sin , AND THE SURVIVAL of EXISTENCE BE not HING MORE THAN A NATURALLY OCCURRING PHENOMENON?
IF not , WHY?
REPLY...NO!
All basic Living Life must survive in order for death to take place.
Not visa-versa.
Existence Does Not first depend upon death to first take place, but survival to first take place.
The survival of existence Does Not depend upon death to first take place, but survival to first take place.
Likewise:
Sin Does first depend upon survival to first take place.
Not visa-versa.

QUESTION:...MIGHT not DEATH BE not HING MORE THAN A NATURALLY OCCURRING PHENOMENON WITHIN SURVIVAL?
IF not , WHY?
REPLY...NO!
Survival itself is the reality of Good.
Where the reality of sin and evil Is Not survival, but death.

QUESTION:...Is IT not PROVEN IN NATURE THAT THE SURVIVAL of MANY PLANT AND ANIMAL LIFE FORMS DEPENDS UPON THE DEATH of OTHER PLANT AND ANIMAL LIFE FORMS TO NATURALLY OCCUR IN ORDER TO SURVIVE?
REPLY...Upon temporary levels of and within select levels of living existence itself, survival deeply Does deeply depend upon the death of other plant and animal life forms to naturally occur in order to survive.
But for more enduring levels of and within select levels of living existence,...the reliance upon the death of other plant and animal life forms to naturally occur in order to survive become less of a dependence.
Initiation

QUESTION:...Was Sin itself in the Universe, WHEN THE UNIVERSE WAS BROUGHT INto be ING?
REPLY...NO!

QUESTION:...WHEN DID Sin COME INto be ING?
REPLY...Far after God brought the Universe into being.

QUESTION:...What WAS THE UNIVERSE LIKE IN THE BEGINNING FOR LIVING LIFE WITHOUT Sin IN GENERAL?
REPLY...Initially without sin, existence for all Living Life in the Universe ran very smoothly.
In those earliest of times:
The Angels worked closely with God Himself, seeing to all the needs of all God's Creations of Living Life upon the various Planets which God had Created it upon.
All of which allowed for all the Living Life upon those Planets to prosper at an unbelievably and extremely fast rate.

QUESTION:...What WAS THE UNIVERSE LIKE IN THE BEGINNING FOR LIVING LIFE SUCH AS MAN WITHOUT Sin ?
REPLY...Initially without sin, existence for All Humans very successfully prospered in the Universe.
In those earliest of times:
The Angels worked closely with God Himself, seeing to all the needs of all God's Creations of Human Life existing upon the various Planets which God had Created it upon.
All of which allowed for all the Human Life existing upon the various Planets, to escalate at an unbelievably and extremely fast rate.

QUESTION:...What DOES Sin DO TO LIVING LIFE SUCH AS MAN?
REPLY...It gravely taints and distorts the successful livelihood and direction of and for Living Life such as Man.
Enough to the point where the negative undertakings of and within sin does becomes in twined enough within Living Life to establish death.

QUESTION:...What WAS THE UNIVERSE LIKE FOR LIVING LIFE SUCH AS MAN, AFTER THE INITIATION of Sin TOOK PLACE?
REPLY...The prosperity and escalation of Human Life existing upon the Planetary Societies which did succumb to sin became considerably slowed.
And in some cases...to even a virtual "Stand Still".

QUESTION:...How DID Sin FIRST BECOME INITIATED?
REPLY...Sin did become first introduced by the Angel known as Satan.
This grave tainting and distortion of/for Living Life took place when Satan sought to initiate alterations of his own making into God's Creations of Living Life.
The results of which changed the direction to which those Creations of Living Life were going, to become distorted to the point of destruction.
All of which became culminated for Humans upon this Planet with, within, and through Satan's temptation of "Adam" and Eve" (refer to Genesis in the 'Bible').

QUESTION:...Why DIDN'T God STOP SATAN FROM INTRODUCING Sin UPON THE PLANET?
DID not God WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT HIS CREATION of HUMAN LIFE EXISTING UPON THE PLANETS WOULD not BECOME TAINTED OR DISTORTED?
REPLY...If it was simply a question of making sure that His Creation of Human Life existing upon the Planets would not become tainted or distorted...then God would Not have allowed Satan to temp "Adam" or Eve".
Nor would God have allowed sin to have taken place at all.
The answer to this question and dilemma is found in the simple fact that 'God Created Man in His Own Image'.
To be His 'Children' in 'His Own Image'.
***Not the image of slaves.
***Not the image of controlled creatures lacking choice .
***Not the image of mechanical creatures lacking the ability of/for personal judgment.
***Not the image of constrained creatures limited to only select or isolated surroundings.
***Not the image of mere creatures contrived for any sake of God's Own ego.
***Not the image of Love.
It Is Not a question of simply making sure that His Creation of Human Life existing upon the Planets would not become tainted or distorted...but rather **It is** a question of Creating Human Creatures to be 'Children's' in His 'Image', with the same "Free choice" and "Free Will" that God Himself has.

QUESTION:...Why DIDN'T God STOP SATAN FROM INTRODUCING Sin UPON THE PLANET?
DID not God WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PROSPERITY AND ESCALATION of HUMAN LIFE EXISTING UPON THE PLANETS WOULD not BECOME CONSIDERABLY SLOWED?
REPLY...If it was simply a question of making sure that the prosperity and escalation of Human Life existing upon the Planets would not become considerably slowed...then God would Not have allowed Satan to temp "Adam" or Eve".
Nor would God have allowed sin to have taken place at all.
The answer to this question and dilemma is found in the simple fact that 'God Created Man in His Own Image'.
To be His 'Children' in 'His Own Image'.
***Not the image of slaves.
***Not the image of controlled creatures lacking choice .
***Not the image of mechanical creatures lacking the ability of/for personal judgment.
***Not the image of constrained creatures limited to only select or isolated surroundings.
***Not the image of mere creatures contrived for any sake of God's Own ego.
***Not the image of Love.
It Is Not a question of simply making sure that the prosperity and escalation of Human Life existing upon the Planets would not become considerably slowed...but rather **It is** a question of Creating Human Creatures to be 'Children's' in His 'Image', with the same "Free choice" and "Free Will" that God Himself has.

QUESTION:...WOULD not HAVE IT BEEN BENEFICIAL TO God's OVERALL PLANNED WORKINGS TO STOP SATAN FROM INTRODUCING Sin UPON THE PLANET?
REPLY...It would on the short-term be beneficial to God's overall Planned Workings.
But to seek to stop Satan from introducing sin upon the Planet, would Not have been beneficial to God's overall Planned Workings over the long-term.

QUESTION:...Why WOULD not STOPPING SATAN FROM INTRODUCING Sin UPON THE PLANET, HAVE BEEN BENEFICIAL TO God's OVERALL PLANNED WORKINGS OVER THE LONG-TERM?
REPLY...To stop Satan from introducing sin upon the Planet:
***Would have simply made Man a slave.
***Would have simply established a control over Man rather than freedom.
***Would have induced a lacking in/of choice for Man.
***Would have made of Man a mechanical creatures lacking the ability of/for personal judgment.
***Would have constrained Man to limited surroundings that were but select and isolated.
***Would have made of Man but a Creation that was contrived for the sake of God's Own ego rather than Love. Reality Of

QUESTION:...What IS Sin ?
REPLY...Sin is the things of Social and Moral content that are undertaken by Individuals , or Communities:
***Which Do Not Truly undertake successful long-term Individual, or Communal Interaction and survival.
***Which Do Not Truly promote successful long-term Individual, or Communal Interaction and survival.
***Which Do Not Truly accord successful long-term Individual, or Communal Interaction and survival.
***Which Do Not Truly allow successful long-term Individual, or Communal Interaction and survival.

QUESTION:...Why is Sin Ungodly?
REPLY...Sin is the things of Social and Moral content that are undertaken by Individuals , or Communities:
***Which Do Not Truly undertake Godly Individual, or Communal Interaction and survival.
***Which Do Not Truly promote Godly long-term Individual, or Communal Interaction and survival.
***Which Do Not Truly accord Godly long-term Individual, or Communal Interaction and survival.
***Which Do Not Truly allow Godly long-term Individual, or Communal Interaction and survival.
Of which Only True Godliness can.

QUESTION:...What MAKES Sin RELEVANT TO THE SOCIAL AND MORAL CONTENT THAT Are undertake N BY Individuals , or Communities?
REPLY...Man is a Social creature that relies most heavily upon "Moral Content" within Society to survive.
Take away the "Moral Content" within Society, and survival becomes but a momentary endeavor in which chaos takes charge to guide every aspect of existence within Society itself.
Thus the Individual and their Community become slaves to the chaos of/within sin, rather than the master that can 'Overcome' sin.
Sin does but blind Individuals to the True Social and Moral things that do allow long-term Individual, or Communal Interaction and survival.

QUESTION:...MAN IS A CREATURE SUBJECT TO CHANGE, AND THE CHANGES THAT OCCUR ABOUT THEM.
SO HOW DOES Sin BLIND Individuals TO THE TRUE SOCIAL AND MORAL THINGS that do ALLOW LONG-TERM INDIVIDUAL, OR COMMUNAL INTERACTION AND SURVIVAL?
REPLY...It is True that Man is a creature subject to change, and the changes that occur about them,...but at the same time, there are things that can never change.
And if they are changed,...then disaster strikes.
The things concerning God and His Godliness can never change in reality,...so too are the things concerning sin a never changing reality.
An Individual, or Community can choose for their own selves upon the short-term, what is Right from what is wrong.
An Individual, or Community can even choose for their own selves what changes or alterations they want to make or attain for their own selves upon the short-term within what is Right from what is wrong.
But the long-term reality of their choice is always bound within distinct and exacted Moral and Social parameters of Right from wrong that can never become changed.
Good is a "Constant' that begets Good, and Evil is a "Constant' that begets evil.
Which if the Individual or Community does allow themselves to remain blind to the True Social and Moral things of God Himself that do allow long-term Individual, or Communal interaction and survival,...then so too do they never Truly change.
Thus the Individual and their Community remain slaves to the chaos of/within sin, rather than the master that can 'Overcome' sin.