Questioning & Answers
God's Godliness

Becoming Initiated


QUESTION:...Was Sin itself in the Universe, WHEN THE UNIVERSE WAS BROUGHT INto be ING?
REPLY...NO!

QUESTION:...WHEN DID Sin COME INto be ING?
REPLY...Far after God brought the Universe into being.
Before Sin How Initiated In Initiating Sin


















































































Questioning & Answers
God Himself

Before Sin


QUESTION:...What WAS THE UNIVERSE LIKE IN THE BEGINNING FOR LIVING LIFE WITHOUT Sin IN GENERAL?
REPLY...Initially without sin, existence for all Living Life in the Universe ran very smoothly.
In those earliest of times:
The Angels worked closely with God Himself, seeing to all the needs of all God's Creations of Living Life upon the various Planets which God had Created it upon.
All of which allowed for all the Living Life upon those Planets to prosper at an unbelievably and extremely fast rate.

QUESTION:...What WAS THE UNIVERSE LIKE IN THE BEGINNING FOR LIVING LIFE SUCH AS MAN WITHOUT Sin ?
REPLY...Initially without sin, existence for All Humans very successfully prospered in the Universe.
In those earliest of times:
The Angels worked closely with God Himself, seeing to all the needs of all God's Creations of Human Life existing upon the various Planets which God had Created it upon.
All of which allowed for all the Human Life existing upon the various Planets, to escalate at an unbelievably and extremely fast rate.


















































































Questioning & Answers
God Himself

How Initiated


QUESTION:...How DID Sin FIRST BECOME INITIATED?
REPLY...Sin did become first introduced by the Angel known as Satan.
This grave tainting and distortion of/for Living Life took place when Satan sought to initiate alterations of his own making into God's Creations of Living Life.
The results of which changed the direction to which those Creations of Living Life were going, to become distorted to the point of destruction.
All of which became culminated for Humans upon this Planet with, within, and through Satan's temptation of "Adam" and Eve" (refer to Genesis in the 'Bible').

QUESTION:...Why DIDN'T God STOP SATAN FROM INTRODUCING Sin UPON THE PLANET?
DID not God WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT HIS CREATION of HUMAN LIFE EXISTING UPON THE PLANETS WOULD not BECOME TAINTED OR DISTORTED?
REPLY...If it was simply a question of making sure that His Creation of Human Life existing upon the Planets would not become tainted or distorted...then God would Not have allowed Satan to temp "Adam" or Eve".
Nor would God have allowed sin to have taken place at all.
The answer to this question and dilemma is found in the simple fact that 'God Created Man in His Own Image'.
To be His 'Children' in 'His Own Image'.
***Not the image of slaves.
***Not the image of controlled creatures lacking choice .
***Not the image of mechanical creatures lacking the ability of/for personal judgment.
***Not the image of constrained creatures limited to only select or isolated surroundings.
***Not the image of mere creatures contrived for any sake of God's Own ego.
***Not the image of Love.
It Is Not a question of simply making sure that His Creation of Human Life existing upon the Planets would not become tainted or distorted...but rather **It is** a question of Creating Human Creatures to be 'Children's' in His 'Image', with the same "Free choice" and "Free Will" that God Himself has.

QUESTION:...Why DIDN'T God STOP SATAN FROM INTRODUCING Sin UPON THE PLANET?
DID not God WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PROSPERITY AND ESCALATION of HUMAN LIFE EXISTING UPON THE PLANETS WOULD not BECOME CONSIDERABLY SLOWED?
REPLY...If it was simply a question of making sure that the prosperity and escalation of Human Life existing upon the Planets would not become considerably slowed...then God would Not have allowed Satan to temp "Adam" or Eve".
Nor would God have allowed sin to have taken place at all.
The answer to this question and dilemma is found in the simple fact that 'God Created Man in His Own Image'.
To be His 'Children' in 'His Own Image'.
***Not the image of slaves.
***Not the image of controlled creatures lacking choice .
***Not the image of mechanical creatures lacking the ability of/for personal judgment.
***Not the image of constrained creatures limited to only select or isolated surroundings.
***Not the image of mere creatures contrived for any sake of God's Own ego.
***Not the image of Love.
It Is Not a question of simply making sure that the prosperity and escalation of Human Life existing upon the Planets would not become considerably slowed...but rather **It is** a question of Creating Human Creatures to be 'Children's' in His 'Image', with the same "Free choice" and "Free Will" that God Himself has.

QUESTION:...WOULD not HAVE IT BEEN BENEFICIAL TO God's OVERALL PLANNED WORKINGS TO STOP SATAN FROM INTRODUCING Sin UPON THE PLANET?
REPLY...It would on the short-term be beneficial to God's overall Planned Workings.
But to seek to stop Satan from introducing sin upon the Planet, would Not have been beneficial to God's overall Planned Workings over the long-term.

QUESTION:...Why WOULD not STOPPING SATAN FROM INTRODUCING Sin UPON THE PLANET, HAVE BEEN BENEFICIAL TO God's OVERALL PLANNED WORKINGS OVER THE LONG-TERM?
REPLY...To stop Satan from introducing sin upon the Planet:
***Would have simply made Man a slave.
***Would have simply established a control over Man rather than freedom.
***Would have induced a lacking in/of choice for Man.
***Would have made of Man a mechanical creatures lacking the ability of/for personal judgment.
***Would have constrained Man to limited surroundings that were but select and isolated.
***Would have made of Man but a Creation that was contrived for the sake of God's Own ego rather than Love.


















































































Questioning & Answers
God Himself

In Initiating Sin


QUESTION:...What DOES Sin DO TO LIVING LIFE SUCH AS MAN?
REPLY...It gravely taints and distorts the successful livelihood and direction of and for Living Life such as Man.
Enough to the point where the negative undertakings of and within sin does becomes in twined enough within Living Life to establish death.

QUESTION:...What WAS THE UNIVERSE LIKE FOR LIVING LIFE SUCH AS MAN, AFTER THE INITIATION of Sin TOOK PLACE?
REPLY...The prosperity and escalation of Human Life existing upon the Planetary Societies which did succumb to sin became considerably slowed.
And in some cases...to even a virtual "Stand Still".

QUESTION:...How DOES Sin AFFECT THE EXISTENCE of "CHILDREN of God" ONCE IT OCCURS?
REPLY...It gravely taints and distorts the successful livelihood and direction of, for, and in the overall existence of 'Children of Man'...

QUESTION:...TO WHAT DEGREE DOES Sin GRAVELY TAINT OR DISTORT THE SUCCESSFUL LIVELIHOOD AND DIRECTION of, FOR, OR IN THE OVERALL EXISTENCE of "CHILDREN of God"?
REPLY...To the point where the negative undertakings of and within sin do cause for the prosperity and escalation of the Human Life existing upon those Planetary Societies which do succumb to sin, to become considerably slowed.
In some cases, to even a virtual Stand Still...

QUESTION:...TO WHAT DEGREE DOES IS THE EXISTENCE of Sin Truly ABLE TO ALTER EXISTENCE FOR "CHILDREN of God"?
REPLY...YES!
The negative undertakings of and within sin do become entwined enough to alter and establish destruction and death as the norm within or for existence...

Natural or Not

QUESTION:...Is Sin A NATURAL OCCURANCE FOR "CHILDREN of God"?
WHY?
REPLY...NO!
Initially all were created equally perfect in God's Own 'Image'.

QUESTION:...Is THERE ANY PROof THAT Sin A not NATURAL OCCURANCE FOR "CHILDREN of God"?
IF SO, WHAT?
REPLY...YES!
Sin is negative reality:
That Does Not create existence.
That Does Not initiate existence.
That Does seek to contradict Truth in existence.
That Does seek to placate Truth in existence.
That Does seek to Hide Truth in existence.
That Does needs existence to exist.
That only survives because existence does survive.
That is dependant upon existence and the survival of existence to exist.
***The simple fact that there is such a thing as existence, and the survival of existence proves that sin is Not a natural occurrence.

QUESTION:...MIGHT not EXISTENCE, AND THE SURVIVAL of EXISTENCE HAVE not HING to do WITH Sin , BUT BE not HING MORE THAN A "BY PRODUCT" of TRIAL AND ERROR WITHIN A VAST ARRAY of POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE FORCES WITHIN EVOLVING ENDEAVORS THAT Are BUT NATURALLY OCCURRING ABOUT MAN?
IF not , WHY?
REPLY...NO!
If such were the case:
***Then the results of existence would have Not allowed existence to have taken place.
***Then the survival of existence would have Not taken place.
***Then the results of trial and error within the vast array of positive and negative forces, **would Not** have afforded an intelligent enough direction for survival to become pre-empted within existence itself.
***Then the results of trial and error within the vast array of positive and negative forces, **would Not** have afforded survival to become pre-empted has existence itself.

QUESTION:...MIGHT not Sin , AND THE SURVIVAL of EXISTENCE BE not HING MORE THAN A "BALANCE" of THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE FORCES WITHIN EVOLVING ENDEAVORS THAT Are BUT NATURALLY OCCURRING?
IF not , WHY?
REPLY...NO!
If such were the case:
***Then the balance of existence would depend upon sin to allow existence to take place.
***Then the balance of existence would depend upon sin to allow survival to take place..
***Then the results of trial and error within the vast array of positive and negative forces, **would Not** have afforded an intelligent enough direction for survival to become pre-empted within existence itself.
***Then the results of trial and error within the vast array of positive and negative forces, **would Not** have afforded survival to become pre-empted has existence itself.
***Then the results of trial and error within the vast array of positive and negative forces, **would Not** have afforded survival to pre-empted the advent of death itself.

QUESTION:...MIGHT not Sin , AND THE SURVIVAL of EXISTENCE BE not HING MORE THAN A NATURALLY OCCURRING PHENOMENON?
IF not , WHY?
REPLY...NO!
All basic Living Life must survive in order for death to take place.
Not visa-versa.
Existence Does Not first depend upon death to first take place, but survival to first take place.
The survival of existence Does Not depend upon death to first take place, but survival to first take place.
Likewise:
Sin Does first depend upon survival to first take place.
Not visa-versa.

QUESTION:...MIGHT not DEATH BE not HING MORE THAN A NATURALLY OCCURRING PHENOMENON WITHIN SURVIVAL?
IF not , WHY?
REPLY...NO!
Survival itself is the reality of Good.
Where the reality of sin and evil Is Not survival, but death.

QUESTION:...Is IT not PROVEN IN NATURE THAT THE SURVIVAL of MANY PLANT AND ANIMAL LIFE FORMS DEPENDS UPON THE DEATH of OTHER PLANT AND ANIMAL LIFE FORMS TO NATURALLY OCCUR IN ORDER TO SURVIVE?
REPLY...Upon temporary levels of and within select levels of living existence itself, survival deeply Does deeply depend upon the death of other plant and animal life forms to naturally occur in order to survive.
But for more enduring levels of and within select levels of living existence,...the reliance upon the death of other plant and animal life forms to naturally occur in order to survive become less of a dependence.